Today SC order govt employees of the SC / ST category will get the reservation in legally promotion. The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued the order saying that the government should continue the reservation in the promotion, until the constitutional bench in this case could not reach any conclusion. However, the Court did not specify which law to be followed for it. Explain that the Central Government has challenged the decision to cancel the reservation in the promotion of Delhi High Court. Union Minister Ram Vilas Paswan had said that this matter should be appealed in the Supreme Court.
Court said - Promotion should be given in legal manner
- The verdict of the Supreme Court is hearing the petition on the Central Government's petition. This includes Justice Prem Kumar Goyal and Justice Ashok Bhushan.
- On behalf of the government, it was said that due to the decisions of the High Court on reservation in the promotion, they are bound to do so. Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh told the bench, "I am a government and should give reservation to my employees."
On this, the court said that the promotion should be given in legal manner. We do not want to tell what law should be there for it. Further constitutional bench will decide on this.
- Then the ASG told that the Supreme Court decision can be implemented in the 2006 M Nagraj case for promotions in government jobs. It was stated that the creamy layer rules will not be applicable to the promotion of SC / ST employees in government jobs. There are two more cases, one of which was the Indra Sahni versus the Central Government (the decision of the Mandal Commission) of 1992 and the second was the 2005 E.V. Chinnayya versus the Andhra Pradesh government. They were settled with creamy layers in OBC.
The High Court had canceled the memorandum of DOPT
- Akhil Bharatiya Samanta Parishad, along with other people, challenged that memorandum of DOPT of August 13, 1997 in the Delhi High Court. In this, the department had said that the Supreme Court has upheld the benefit of reservation in the promotion of SC / ST in Indira Sahni case for the next five years from November 16, 1992, and all the ministries and other public sector and statutory bodies continued even after 1997. Can keep
- On August 23, 2017, the High Court canceled the memorandum in the verdict saying that whatever decision the Supreme Court has in the case of Indira Sahni or Nagraj, it is clear from all that SC / ST has prepared the figure of representation at the first sight. It is wrong to look back as backward on the basis of improper representation. It violates Article 16 (1) and 335 of the Constitution. The government can not close the eyes and give reservation in the promotion.
Constitutional bench will hear cases related to promotions
On November 15, 2017, the bench of three judges of the Supreme Court was convinced that the 11-year-old Nagraj case should be re-considered. After this, the decision to send the cases related to the promotion to the constitutional bench for hearing was taken. Now the Constitutional Bench will also hear the petition of the Center along with all the pending cases related to the promotion.
Paswan had said - will go to the Supreme Court for promotion
In April this year, Union Minister Ram Vilas Paswan had said that keeping in mind the interests of Dalits, the government will appeal in the Supreme Court for reservation in promotions. So that they get the benefit of it
Tag - dopt gconnect reservation in promotion total govt mbbs seats in neet 2018 supreme court cases sc st sc st promotion supreme court judgement on reservation in promotion 2018 sc st reservation reservation in neet 2018 reservation in promotion latest news supreme court judgement on reservation reservation in promotion latest news 2018 supreme court decision on reservation sc st reservation in promotion sc/st reservation promotion in reservation reservation in promotion supreme court reservation news supreme court decision supreme court judgement on promotion reservation supreme court judgement on reservation in promotion
Court said - Promotion should be given in legal manner
- On behalf of the government, it was said that due to the decisions of the High Court on reservation in the promotion, they are bound to do so. Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh told the bench, "I am a government and should give reservation to my employees."
On this, the court said that the promotion should be given in legal manner. We do not want to tell what law should be there for it. Further constitutional bench will decide on this.
- Then the ASG told that the Supreme Court decision can be implemented in the 2006 M Nagraj case for promotions in government jobs. It was stated that the creamy layer rules will not be applicable to the promotion of SC / ST employees in government jobs. There are two more cases, one of which was the Indra Sahni versus the Central Government (the decision of the Mandal Commission) of 1992 and the second was the 2005 E.V. Chinnayya versus the Andhra Pradesh government. They were settled with creamy layers in OBC.
The High Court had canceled the memorandum of DOPT
- Akhil Bharatiya Samanta Parishad, along with other people, challenged that memorandum of DOPT of August 13, 1997 in the Delhi High Court. In this, the department had said that the Supreme Court has upheld the benefit of reservation in the promotion of SC / ST in Indira Sahni case for the next five years from November 16, 1992, and all the ministries and other public sector and statutory bodies continued even after 1997. Can keep
- On August 23, 2017, the High Court canceled the memorandum in the verdict saying that whatever decision the Supreme Court has in the case of Indira Sahni or Nagraj, it is clear from all that SC / ST has prepared the figure of representation at the first sight. It is wrong to look back as backward on the basis of improper representation. It violates Article 16 (1) and 335 of the Constitution. The government can not close the eyes and give reservation in the promotion.
Constitutional bench will hear cases related to promotions
On November 15, 2017, the bench of three judges of the Supreme Court was convinced that the 11-year-old Nagraj case should be re-considered. After this, the decision to send the cases related to the promotion to the constitutional bench for hearing was taken. Now the Constitutional Bench will also hear the petition of the Center along with all the pending cases related to the promotion.
Paswan had said - will go to the Supreme Court for promotion
In April this year, Union Minister Ram Vilas Paswan had said that keeping in mind the interests of Dalits, the government will appeal in the Supreme Court for reservation in promotions. So that they get the benefit of it
Tag - dopt gconnect reservation in promotion total govt mbbs seats in neet 2018 supreme court cases sc st sc st promotion supreme court judgement on reservation in promotion 2018 sc st reservation reservation in neet 2018 reservation in promotion latest news supreme court judgement on reservation reservation in promotion latest news 2018 supreme court decision on reservation sc st reservation in promotion sc/st reservation promotion in reservation reservation in promotion supreme court reservation news supreme court decision supreme court judgement on promotion reservation supreme court judgement on reservation in promotion
Comments
Post a Comment